Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2010 19:08:54 GMT
While skimming around looking at solid state memory options I bumped into this fellow Full review here. Incredibly fast if you pop a USB 3.0 card into your PC.
|
|
XTRProf
Fully Modded
Pssst ! Got any spare capacitors ?
Posts: 5,689
|
Post by XTRProf on Oct 19, 2010 8:48:17 GMT
Price: $193.99 (from Amazon at time of review) Very pricey now still at 64 GB. Obviously, it must be faster then the rest as it's the new USB 3 interface. ;D It will be great for storing audio files.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2010 9:02:41 GMT
Price: $193.99 (from Amazon at time of review) Very pricey now still at 64 GB. Obviously, it must be faster then the rest as it's the new USB 3 interface. ;D It will be great for storing audio files. Chong Other than the portability aspect, it may have been better to fit an internal SSD drive.64GB dsoesn't go too far if you are storing .wav files, especially if you DL high res files from Linn Records or HD tracks. Alex
|
|
XTRProf
Fully Modded
Pssst ! Got any spare capacitors ?
Posts: 5,689
|
Post by XTRProf on Oct 19, 2010 9:37:24 GMT
Price: $193.99 (from Amazon at time of review) Very pricey now still at 64 GB. Obviously, it must be faster then the rest as it's the new USB 3 interface. ;D It will be great for storing audio files. Chong Other than the portability aspect, it may have been better to fit an internal SSD drive.64GB dsoesn't go too far if you are storing .wav files, especially if you DL high res files from Linn Records or HD tracks. Alex Yes, I agreed it doesn't store much music for 64Gig but for external SSD, we don't have to on it all the time. We can eject it and save on the wear and tear of being on all the time for internal SSD. Btw, what's the biggest internal SSD nowadays?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2010 9:49:41 GMT
As at July 26, it was 2TB. Want to buy me one for Xmas ? If you need to ask the price, then you can't afford it !
|
|
|
Post by sondale on Oct 19, 2010 20:58:34 GMT
On my cMP2 computer I use an SSD to run the system (a cut down Windows XP Pro) - all the music is stored on 320gb hard-disks - seems to work a treat.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2010 21:12:20 GMT
On my cMP2 computer I use an SSD to run the system (a cut down Windows XP Pro) - all the music is stored on 320gb hard-disks - seems to work a treat. sondale If you are storing .wav files, and can afford SSDs instead of HDDs, you will obtain a further small improvement in SQ, provided that your system is revealing enough. SandyK
|
|
XTRProf
Fully Modded
Pssst ! Got any spare capacitors ?
Posts: 5,689
|
Post by XTRProf on Oct 20, 2010 5:43:18 GMT
As at July 26, it was 2TB. Want to buy me one for Xmas ? If you need to ask the price, then you can't afford it ! Still can ask as I can strike Big Sweep (lottery) this weekend ........
|
|
|
Post by sondale on Oct 20, 2010 8:22:16 GMT
On my cMP2 computer I use an SSD to run the system (a cut down Windows XP Pro) - all the music is stored on 320gb hard-disks - seems to work a treat. sondale If you are storing .wav files, and can afford SSDs instead of HDDs, you will obtain a further small improvement in SQ, provided that your system is revealing enough. SandyK Sandy - all music is stored as .wav files - when the prices of SSDs become reasonable I will change-over, until then..... Alan
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2010 8:25:31 GMT
sondale If you are storing .wav files, and can afford SSDs instead of HDDs, you will obtain a further small improvement in SQ, provided that your system is revealing enough. SandyK Sandy - all music is stored as .wav files - when the prices of SSDs become reasonable I will change-over, until then..... Alan Alan My sentiments too. In the meantime, I store demo type material on a couple of Corsair Voyager GT USB pens, and the less played stuff on HDD. Alex
|
|
mrarroyo
Been here a while!
Our man in Miami!
Posts: 1,003
|
Post by mrarroyo on Oct 20, 2010 10:52:52 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2010 11:36:18 GMT
Miguel The problem here is that to use a 2.5" SSD in a normal Desktop PC (3.5"HDDs) you need special adaptors, which aren't normally supplied. I read about an SSD recently that plugs into a PCI slot, and works like a Raid array with virtually record breaking speeds for SSD, even quite a bit faster than the industry leading Intel SSD. Alex
|
|
|
Post by sondale on Oct 20, 2010 22:52:13 GMT
Miguel The problem here is that to use a 2.5" SSD in a normal Desktop PC (3.5"HDDs) you need special adaptors, which aren't normally supplied. I read about an SSD recently that plugs into a PCI slot, and works like a Raid array with virtually record breaking speeds for SSD, even quite a bit faster than the industry leading Intel SSD. Alex The cMP2 setup uses 2.5 inch HDDs - to make sure there is no noise they are put into 3.5 sound-proof caddy's and therefore fit the normal slots - my SSD is just stood upright in the box - after all there are no moving parts!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2010 23:04:44 GMT
Try telling that it makes a difference to some people though, whether there are moving parts or not.! (I am referring to SQ, NOT noise.) Also , FAR lower power supply demands.
|
|
mrarroyo
Been here a while!
Our man in Miami!
Posts: 1,003
|
Post by mrarroyo on Oct 21, 2010 10:28:17 GMT
|
|