X-Can V3 afterthought!
Feb 24, 2008 14:12:49 GMT
Post by krisno on Feb 24, 2008 14:12:49 GMT
X-Can v3 with littlie pinkie v3i on the AKG K701, using X-DAC v3 and silver interconnects as source.
X-Can v3 has lack of details
X-Can v3 'soundstage' is all lost at lower volumes
X-Can v3 has very bad separation. Everything other than vocal just suck.
I remember I said earlier that I like Krell, maybe that is why... ANYWAYS:
A $50 solid state headphone out amp fixes all my problems
1: It gives alot of details
2: It has a nice soundstage even at low volumes, you hear everything
3: Separation is excellent, you can place every object in the '3d scene'.
Now I thought this was a tube problem, and that tubes in general is not for me whatsoever. But then I read a Earmax pro review vs Lehmann vs X-Can v3. And the review'er say exactly the same about the x-can v3. It is crap. But what he says also that the Earmax Pro has jus tas good separation as the Lehmann!!
So this is not a tube problem then?
I am sure that the X-can v3 has better transistors than my $30 headphone out thing. Does this mean that if I get some of the BEST VALVES money can buy and put into the new X-Can V8(or V3), WILL IT FIX MY problems above with the x-can? Is it just the specific tube BRAND which smudges everything and kills the separation??
I am going to use this for music, and stay happy with it, but I need this problem fixed.
Any comments? This problem I am sure persists on the HD650 also.
Kris
P.S. I will try the X-can v8, to see if it feels nice to have everything 'integrated' and SQ is good. Probably I will end up with the Lehmann in the end.
(P.S.2 What makes many people complain about USB quality is because it depens so much on the audio stack in the OS. The audio stack in XP is the worst ever, almost as bad on Mac os X, but in Vista, the audio stack is 10 x better, so USB dacs will sound much better on vista...)
X-Can v3 has lack of details
X-Can v3 'soundstage' is all lost at lower volumes
X-Can v3 has very bad separation. Everything other than vocal just suck.
I remember I said earlier that I like Krell, maybe that is why... ANYWAYS:
A $50 solid state headphone out amp fixes all my problems
1: It gives alot of details
2: It has a nice soundstage even at low volumes, you hear everything
3: Separation is excellent, you can place every object in the '3d scene'.
Now I thought this was a tube problem, and that tubes in general is not for me whatsoever. But then I read a Earmax pro review vs Lehmann vs X-Can v3. And the review'er say exactly the same about the x-can v3. It is crap. But what he says also that the Earmax Pro has jus tas good separation as the Lehmann!!
So this is not a tube problem then?
I am sure that the X-can v3 has better transistors than my $30 headphone out thing. Does this mean that if I get some of the BEST VALVES money can buy and put into the new X-Can V8(or V3), WILL IT FIX MY problems above with the x-can? Is it just the specific tube BRAND which smudges everything and kills the separation??
I am going to use this for music, and stay happy with it, but I need this problem fixed.
Any comments? This problem I am sure persists on the HD650 also.
Kris
P.S. I will try the X-can v8, to see if it feels nice to have everything 'integrated' and SQ is good. Probably I will end up with the Lehmann in the end.
(P.S.2 What makes many people complain about USB quality is because it depens so much on the audio stack in the OS. The audio stack in XP is the worst ever, almost as bad on Mac os X, but in Vista, the audio stack is 10 x better, so USB dacs will sound much better on vista...)